Review process

Author instructions: We follow a single-blind peer review process. Each article will be assigned to 2-3 reviewers. Articles will be selected for presentation and publication only if at least two reviewers select the article after completing the review process.

Important instructions

• Researcher will post their submission on provided software.
• Technical Program Committee (TPC) will go for first level screening and decide to send it for further review process or it could be rejected at screening level also.
• Further each research paper will send it to three different reviewers and will collect their comments through provided software.
• TPC will collate reviews of three reviewers and decide it to recommend or not to recommend reviewed papers for springer review process.
• Final review of shortlisted manuscripts will be carried out at Springer end (Chief Editor Springer).

Plagiarism Policy

ISRSD-2026 is intended to accept ONLY high-level quality papers that have originality and novelty in content. The conference strongly suggests NOT using or copying any part of the already published materials. The papers submitted to the conference will first undergo a screening process for originality in content. If they meet this requirement, the papers will be sent for further review. Otherwise, the papers will be rejected at the first level. The authors who indulge in plagiarism will be blacklisted. The paper, prior to submission, should be checked for plagiarism using licensed plagiarism software, such as Turnitin/iAuthenticate. The similarity content should not exceed 15% (in any case, either self-content or others). Further, you have to strictly implement the following ethical guidelines for publication:

• Any form of self-plagiarism or plagiarism from others' work(s) should not be there in an article. If any model/concept/figure/table/data / conclusive comment by any previously published work is used in your article, you should properly cite a reference to the original work.
• Also, the language of explaining it should not be the same as the language of the work from which you have adopted it. If you are using any copyrighted material, you should acquire prior permission from the copyright holder.
• Papers found to be plagiarised during any stage of review shall be rejected without any REVIEW, and no notification will be sent to the author regarding this.

Copyright Policy

As an author/editor of a work, you may be responsible for overseeing the inclusion of third-party content. By ‘third-party content’ we mean any work that you have not created yourself and which you have reproduced or adapted from other sources. Authors remain fully responsible for ensuring that they have obtained, documented and paid for (when applicable), all necessary rights to use third-party content in their works. If authors choose to reuse third-party content from a previous edition of their work, they are also responsible for ensuring they obtained permission from the third party for new editions.